Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of OI reproductive options

From: Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review

Pre-pregnancy testing

 

Genetic Testing

PCS

 Target user

People affected with OI

People with risk of OI (OI family history, consanguinity, founder population origin)

 Advantages

Fast and informative

Fast and informative

 Limitations

VUS; negative results of genetic test

Parental mosaicism; de novo OI; VUS

Fertilisation methods

 

Natural pregnancy

IVF with PGT-M

IVF with donor germ cells

IVF with donor embryo

 Genetically related child

Yes

Yes

No

No

 Child without OI

Unknown

Yes

Yes

Yes

 OI mother’s health challenges

Pregnancy, delivery

Superovulation, pregnancy, delivery

Superovulation, pregnancy, delivery

Pregnancy, delivery

 Limitations

PGT-M unavailable, high chance of OI affected pregnancy, de novo variants, variable phenotypic expressivity of OI

De novo variants

De novo variants, PCS need to be done for sex cell donors

De novo variants

Prenatal testing

 

NIPT

Ultrasound

CVS

Amniocentesis

Cordocentesis

 Non-invasive

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

 Week of gestation

7th–10th

20th

10th–12th

15th–20th

22nd-24th

 Tests foetal abnormalities, OI

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Differs OI 2–3

No

No

No

No

No

 Risk of misdiagnosis

Yes (placental mosaicism)

Yes (differential diagnosis)

Yes (placental mosaicism)

No

No

 Limitations

Unavailable before 7th week of gestation, high mother’s BMI

Unavailable at early gestation weeks

Unavailable at early gestation weeks, risk of miscarriage ~ 1%

Unavailable at early gestation weeks, risk of miscarriage ~ 0.5–1%

Unavailable at early gestation weeks, risk of miscarriage ~ 1–2%

  1. BMI Body mass index, CVS Chorionic villus sampling, IVF PGT-M In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease, NIPT Non-invasive prenatal testing, PCS Preconception carrier screening, VUS Variant of unknown significance