Recommendations | Population | Grade strength | Quality of evidence (Average) | Quality of evidence | Key references |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
i. We strongly recommend access to psychosocial family support to improve the family QoL | |||||
Early psychosocial support to improve QoL of the family unit for all subtypes EB and children with high infantile mortality: • As caregivers QoL may also be impacted. • Psychological support and close monitoring helps. • Support is essential for family of palliative patients with EB. | Adults, children; 11 studies EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Children (n = 16) JEB | B | 2+ | 1- 2+ 2- | [29] [30] [38] |
ii. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to improve the family well-being | |||||
Support for the family to reduce emotional burden of caring for someone with EB and improve well-being for the family unit: • Home nursing can provide much needed relief and support for primary caregivers and could reduce the need for hospital admission. • Actively assist in seeking counselling before the family unit is irreparably destroyed. • Provide information about the nature, course and outcome of EB. • Provide training in the management of patient symptoms. • Access to Social media and face to face EB support groups might be beneficial for families. Promoting family well-being can help the family enhance their strong and positive influence for those living with EB • The way the family reacts to EB can be psychologically assimilated by the person with EB, particularly children. • Acceptance of the EB by the family is important and can make it more bearable for the patient. | Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children, Adults (n = 374/ 425) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Adults, children (n = 25, 14 children, 11 adults) RDEB, EBS Adult – personal experience | C | 2- | 2+ 2+ 2- 4 2+ 4 | [50] [52] [30] [36] [53] [54] |
iii. We strongly recommend family counselling in order to prevent family breakdown | |||||
To help prevent the family unit breakdown, for the family of all EB subtypes: • Strengthen family relationships. To prevent family emotional breakdown or distress • Support in managing life with EB. To prevent parents’ emotional breakdown or distress • Specially provide support for single parents with a child living with EB. | Children, Adults (n = 374/ 425) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2+ 2- | [52] [50] [17] |
Adults, children (n = 28/42) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 16) JEB Children, Young Adults; (n = 63/138) EBS; DDEB; RDEB+ | 2- 2- 2- | [16] [38] [55] | |||
Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS | 2- | [30] | |||
iv. We strongly recommend psychosocial support to help the whole family to cope with living with EB | |||||
Specialist home based psychosocial support for the family of all EB subtypes can help promote strategies to cope: • Help access counselling to promote the intra-family communication. • Access help to manage EB and economic burden. • Promote good relationships between the family • Provide a home care program for respite, or support handing over physical care to others. | Children (n = 21) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 125/185) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB; KS Adults, children (n = 28/42) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- 2- | [51] [30] [16] [17] |
v. We recommend psychosocial support to reduce emotional burden during daily painful procedures | |||||
Psychosocial support needs for parents and family to reduce the emotional burden of caring for someone living with EB who has severe pain: • Offer psychological support for caregivers. Parents/care givers can struggle with ‘causing pain’ due to dressing changes and wanting to protect their child from pain. This is very difficult emotionally for parents. • Pain can negatively affect relationships within the family and with friends. Help optimise pain management techniques. • Parents/carers can find it difficult to see people in severe pain. Aid access to respite, independent carers and promote independence with dressings. | ✓ Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children; (n = 57) EBS-I Adult (n = 6/20) JEB, DDEB | C | 2- | 2+ 2- 2- | [17] [42] [40] |
vi. We strongly recommend easy access to a multidisciplinary expert team for the whole family | |||||
Provide access to recognised expert support and training for the whole family • Provide appropriate treatment and training or refer to national EB experts. • Referring to with the DEBRA or EB support network may help. | Adults, children; 11 studies EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adults, children (n = 15) RDEB Children (n = 21) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Children (n = 11/82) EBS; JEB; DDEB; RDEB Adult (n = 1) RDEB | C | 2- | 1- 2+ 2+ 2+ 4 | [29] [50] [51] [17] [39]α |
Key: EB: Epidermolysis Bullosa; RDEB: Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; JEB: Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa; DDEB: Dominant Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa; EBS: Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex EBS-I: Localised form of EBS; KS Kindler Syndrome; QoL: quality of life; n: number of; α: gray literature; ⇒this is an EB guideline | |||||
Grades | Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | ||||
B | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2++, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 1++ or 1+ | ||||
C | A body of evidence including studies rated as 2+, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or Extrapolated evidence from studies rated as 2++ | ||||
Ratings Descriptions in accordance to SIGN [22] | |||||
1- | Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or RCTs with a high risk of bias | ||||
2+ | Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal | ||||
2- | Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk | ||||
4- | Expert opinion | ||||
✔ Recommended best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group [22] |