Skip to main content

Table 4 Progression trend of the ‘Physical functioning’ concept since starting study treatment up to Week 25 and its correspondence with quantitative assessments

From: How to address the challenges of evaluating treatment benefits-risks in rare diseases? A convergent mixed methods approach applied within a Merkel cell carcinoma phase 2 clinical trial

Patient #

Qualitative assessment

Quantitative assessment

Physical functioning

Overall response by IERC per RECISTa

Change in FACT-M score related to Physical functioning

Physical Well-being

Functional Well-being

1

Improvement

Partial/complete responder

No change

Improvement

2

Improvement

Partial/complete responder

Worsening

Worsening

3

Improvement

Partial/complete responder

No change

Worsening

4

Improvement

Partial/complete responder

Improvement

Improvement

5

No change (no impact)

Partial/complete responder

No change

Improvement

6

No change (no impact)

Partial/complete responder

No change

Improvement

7

No change (no impact)

Partial/complete responder

Improvement

Improvement

8

Improvement

Partial/complete responder

NC

NC

9

No change (no impact)

Progressive disease

Worsening

Improvement

  1. NC Not computed, due to missing baseline data, IERC Independent Endpoint Review Committee; RECIST: Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1
  2. aOverall response by IERC per RECIST identical at both Week 13 and Week 25 for all patients