Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the PHARE-M Group and the paired Control Group

From: Quality of care in cystic fibrosis: assessment protocol of the French QIP PHARE-M

Comparison between PHARE-M Group and Control Group

PIIARE-M (N = l104)

Controles

(N = 1104)

Patients PHARE non paired

(N = 205)

Comparison between PIIARE-M Group and Control Group (proc TTEST)

Gender

Men n (%)

582 (52.72)

564 (51.09)

93 (45.37)

 

Female n (%)

522 (47.28)

540 (48.91)

112 (54.63)

 

Age

Average

15.57

16.05

14.48

 

Std Deviation

10.73

11.00

10.51

 

Age (classes)

0-04 n (%)

182 (16.49)

175 (15.85)

32 (15.611)

 

05-09 n (%)

209 (18.93)

206 (18.66)

42 (20.49)

 

10-14 n (%)

213 (19.29)

204 (18.48)

48 (23.41)

 

15-19 n (%)

169 (15.31)

168 (15.22)

38 (18.54)

 

20-24 n (%)

125 (11.32)

130 (11.78)

19 (927)

 

25-29 n (%)

93 (8.42)

84 (7.61)

10 (4.88)

 

30-34 n (%)

53 (4.80)

68 (6.16)

4 (1.95)

 

35-39 n (%)

36 (3.26)

34 (3.08)

6 (2.93)

 

40-44 n (%)

7 (0.63)

18 (1.63)

1 (0.49)

 

45-49 n (%)

9 (0.82)

11 (1.00)

4 (1.95)

 

50-54 n (%)

4 (0.36)

3 (0.27)

0

 

55-59 n (%)

4 (0.36)

2 (0.18)

0

 

60-64 n (%)

0

0

1 (0.49)

 

70-74 n (%)

0

1 (0.09)

0

 

VEMS

Nmtss

223

270

49

(p = 0.0012 IS)

Average

83.00

79.11

85 06

Std Deviation

23.96

25.81

21.92

ZBMI

Nmiss

7

39

2

p = 0.5171 (NS>)

Average

-0.17

-0.14

-0.18

Std Deviation

1.05

1.15

1.11

  1. S Significant; NS Non Significant