Skip to main content

Table 5 Group comparison between anosognosic (n = 33) and non anosognosic (n = 31) DM1 patients, in cognitive domains of functioning; statistically significant p-values are shown in bold

From: Disease awareness in myotonic dystrophy type 1: an observational cross-sectional study

  Anosognosic (n = 33) Non anosognosic (n = 31)  
  mean corrected scores (SD) mean corrected scores (SD) p-value
RAVLT IR 41.1 (7.8) 42.1 (6.9) .612
RAVLT DR 9.0 (1.7) 9.1 (1.8) .851
Rey Osterrieth Figure (ROCF) Copy 27.6 (6.1) 28.5 (5.7) .597
Rey Osterrieth Figure (ROCF) IR 12.8 (6.3) 15.5 (5.5) .124
Rey Osterrieth Figure (ROCF) DR 12.3 (6.6) 14.5 (6.8) .265
Digit Span 5.1 (1.2) 5.2 (1.1) .813
Corsi’s Block Test (CBT) 3.9 (0.8) 4.4 (0.6) .060a
Trail Making Test A (TMT A) 54.1 (19.9) 57.8 (46.1) .732
Trail making Test B (TMT B) 140.2 (78.9) 122.3 (31.4) .351
FAS (phonemic fluency) 26.3 (8.7) 31.3 (10.5) .083
FAB 15.1 (1.2) 15.3 (1.4) .576
STROOP Time Interference 33.5 (28.4) 32.4 (22.2) .881
STROOP Error Interference 3.4 (5.3) 2.5 (2.6) .487
PM47 25.5 (0.3) 27.5 (4.2) .202
WCST Categories (Cat) 3.0 (1.9) 4.7 (1.5) .001
WCST Perseverative Errors (pe) 6.7 (4.6) 4.0 (3.4) .028
  1. a considerable trend toward significance