Table 4 Outcome on kidney angiomyolipoma
Studies | Volume (cc) | Sum of longest diameter (mm) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | n | After treatment | n | Mean diff (95Â % CI) | Baseline | n | After treatment | n | Mean diff (95Â % CI) | |
Cabrera Lopez 2011 | 62.6 ± 18.3 | 17 | 23.1 ± 7.0 | 16 | −39.5 (−30.15,–48.85) |  |  |  |  |  |
Dabora 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | 212 ± 146 | 36 | 145 ± 113 | 28 | −67 (−3.55,–130.5) |
Davies 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | 135.5 ± 135.6 | 10 | 62.8 ± 20.1 | 7 | −69.80 (15.39,–154.99) |
Overall Effect |  |  |  |  | −39.5 (−48.85, −30.15) |  |  |  |  | −69.03 (−158.05, 12.65) |
|  |  |  |  | p = <0.00001 |  |  |  |  | p = 0.008 | |
Heterogeneity |  |  |  |  | Not applicable |  |  |  |  | Chi2 = 0.01; I2 = 0 % |