Skip to main content

Table 1 Reliability and limitations of diagnostic methods in NPC

From: Observational, retrospective study of a large cohort of patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C in the Czech Republic: a surprisingly stable diagnostic rate spanning almost 40 years

Diagnostic method

Sensitivity

Specificity

Comment

Clinical evaluation

Low-to-moderate

Usually low

Depends on the form and stage of disease and experience of clinician

Histology, histochemistry and electron microscopy of appropriate tissues (bone marrow smear, spleen, liver, brain)

Not exactly defined, in particular tissue probably moderate, at autopsy moderate-to-high

High

Must be performed by experienced histopathologist*

Filipin staining test (alone or in combination with LDL-cholesterol assay)

High (but not absolute)

High (but not absolute)

Must be performed by experienced laboratory. Less reliable in persons with “variant biochemical subtype”. Similar results in some other IEM**.

Molecular genetic analysis

High (but not absolute)

High (but not absolute)

Only one mutation identified in some patients; difficult decision regarding pathogenicity of novel private mutations in NPC genes

  1. *See references [12]-[15]; **inborn errors of metabolism.