Open Access

Clinical and animal research findings in pycnodysostosis and gene mutations of cathepsin K from 1996 to 2011

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases20116:20

DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-20

Received: 14 February 2011

Accepted: 10 May 2011

Published: 10 May 2011

Abstract

Cathepsin K (CTSK) is a member of the papain-like cysteine protease family. Mutations in the CTSK gene cause a rare autosomal recessive bone disorder called pycnodysostosis (OMIM 265800). In order to follow the advances in the research about CTSK and pycnodysostosis, we performed a literature retrospective study of 159 pycnodysostosis patients reported since 1996 and focused on the genetic characteristics of CTSK mutations and/or the clinical phenotypes of pycnodysostosis. Thirty three different CTSK mutations have been found in 59 unrelated pycnodysostosis families. Of the 59 families, 37.29% are from Europe and 30.51% are from Asia. A total of 69.70% of the mutations were identified in the mature domain of CTSK, 24.24% in the proregion, and 6.06% in the preregion. The hot mutation spots are found in exons 6 and 7. CTSK mutations result in total loss or inactivity of the CTSK protein, which causes abnormal degradation of bone matrix proteins such as type I collagen. Skeletal abnormalities, including short stature, an increase in bone density with pathologic fractures, and open fontanels and sutures, are the typical phenotypes of pycnodysostosis. Research on Ctsk-/- mouse models was also reviewed here to elucidate the biological function of Ctsk and the mechanism of pycnodysostosis. New evidence suggests that Ctsk plays an important role in the immune system and may serve as a valid therapeutic target in the future treatment of pycnodysostosis.

Keywords

cathepsin K pycnodysostosis osteoclast bone oral deformities

Introduction

Pycnodysostosis (OMIM 265800) is a rare autosomal recessive bone disorder resulting from osteoclast dysfunction [14]. The first case of pycnodysostosis was described in 1923 by Montanari; however, Maroteaux and Lamy defined the typical features of pycnodysostosis (Greek: pycnos = dense; dys = defective; osteon = bone) in 1962. Thus, it is also known as Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome. This disorder is also called Toulouse-Lautrec syndrome after the famous French artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, who was thought to be afflicted with the disease [2, 3, 5]. Less than 200 cases have been reported worldwide since 1962 [1]. The prevalence of pycnodysostosis is estimated to be 1 to 1.7 per million with equal sex distribution [47]. The typical features of pycnodysostosis include short stature, an increase in the bone density of long bones, pathological fractures with poor healing, stubby hands and feet with dystrophic nails, unossified fontanels, and an obtuse mandibular angle [5, 810].

The candidate gene for pycnodysostosis was mapped to human chromosome 1q21 by genetic linkage analysis, and was subsequently identified as coding for cathepsin K (CTSK, MIM# 601105) by a positional cloning strategy in 1996 [1113]. The CTSK gene spans approximately 12 kb (GenBank acc. no., NC_000001.10) and contains 8 exons (GenBank acc. no., NM_000396.2). The codon for the translation initiator methionine (Met1) is located in exon 2, whereas the termination codon is located in exon 8. The CTSK protein, highly similar to cathepsins S and L, is a member of the papain-like cysteine protease family. Like most papain-like cysteine proteases, CTSK consists of 329 amino acids (GenBank acc. no., NP_000387.1), including a 15-amino acid preregion, a 99-amino acid proregion, and a 215-amino acid mature active enzyme [14]. CTSK is synthesized as an inactive precursor protein and requires removal of its N-terminal proregion for activation. This autocatalytic process occurs under a low-pH environment [3].

To date, it is difficult to find a full description of the characteristics of specific gene mutations and clinical manifestations of pycnodysostosis in the literature. In this study, we analyzed the reported CTSK mutations and summarized the typical clinical features of pycnodysostosis from 159 reported patients and some animal research findings in Ctsk gene knockout mice (Ctsk -/- mice). Early reports of CTSK mutations were renamed in this study with the first base in the CTSK gene (GenBank acc. no., NC_000001.10) as the +1 position in genomic DNA, and the A of the ATG-translation initiation codon as nucleotide +1 in cDNA (GenBank acc. no., NM_000396.2).

Structure of CTSK

CTSK is also called lysosomal cysteine cathepsin K because it contains a cysteine in its active site and functions mainly in lysosomes [15]. Like most lysosomal cysteine proteases, CTSK is synthesized as an inactive proenzyme [3, 16]. The preregion plays a critical role in targeting the protein to the endoplasmic reticulum and translocating the protein across the membrane [1719]. While the proregion plays a role in protein folding and intracellular trafficking, it can also inhibit protease function until the proenzyme reaches the lysosome [20]. The proregion contains a conserved N-glycosylation site (Asn103), which is supposed to facilitate lysosomal trafficking via the mannose 6-phosphate receptor pathway [11, 14, 20]. The proenzyme requires removal of its N-terminal proregion for activation [16]. This process has been proven to be autocatalytic in lysosomes at a pH of 4 [3, 21]. CTSK consists of 2 domains folded together, resulting in a V-shaped configuration [22, 23]. The catalytic triad, consisting of Cys139, His276, and Asn296 in the active sites, localizes at the bottom of the V cleft [14, 15, 24, 25].

Distribution of CTSK

CTSK is highly expressed in osteoclasts and has lower expression levels in the heart, lung, skeletal muscle, colon, ovary, and placenta [3, 5, 20]. Additionally, CTSK mRNA was detected in macrophages and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, but was barely detected in nonadherent bone marrow cells or splenic T cells [26, 27].

Function of CTSK

In osteoclasts

CTSK, which is critical for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, is highly expressed in osteoclasts. In osteoclasts, CTSK is responsible for the degradation of bone matrix proteins, such as type I collagen, osteopontin, and osteonectin [3, 5, 20]. A tightly sealed resorption lacuna between the osteoclast and the bone is called an extracellular lysosome. Dissolution of the inorganic matrix and degradation of the organic matrix occur in the extracellular lysosome under low pH conditions [28, 29]. In mature osteoclasts, CTSK is synthesized as an inactive proenzyme and cleaved by autoproteolysis to produce the active form of the protein. This active form is then secreted into the extracellular lysosome [3032], where it degrades bone matrix proteins, particularly type I collagen, which constitutes 95% of the organic bone matrix [3, 5, 15, 20, 33]. CTSK deficiency does not affect the function of osteoclast-mediated extracellular acidification [34]. Ctsk mutations were found to impair the ability of osteoclasts to degrade collagen rather than demineralize the extracellular matrix.

On the other hand, CTSK may also act as a potential regulator of apoptosis and senescence, controlling osteoclast numbers in vivo[34]. Thus, impairment of CTSK-mediated osteoclast apoptosis/senescence may also be responsible for the higher number of osteoclasts found in Ctsk -/- mice [34].

In immunocytes

A pycnodysostosis patient with normal immune status was reported in 1999 [35]. However, impaired killing activity of monocytes with normal phagocytic capacity and decreased levels of IL-1 secretion were reported in pycnodysostosis patients in an earlier study [36].

In an early animal study, abnormities of histological morphology or cellularity were found neither in the thymus nor in the levels of B and T lymphocytes in peripheral blood [37]. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis showed no difference in the lymphocyte markers (CD4, CD8, CD3, B220, IgM, and IgD) between Ctsk-/- and wild-type mice. Immunophenotype analysis of the cell types in the bone marrow revealed a significant decrease in the absolute cell number of all subtypes, even though the percentage of each subtype in the entire population was unchanged [37].

Recently, Ctsk was found to function in the endosomes of dendritic cells. Pharmacological inhibition or targeted disruption of Ctsk led to defective Toll-like receptor 9 signaling in dendritic cells when stimulated with cytosine-phosphate- guanine, but not when stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or peptidoglycan. It was shown that Ctsk is indispensable for differentiation of dendritic cells, but not required for antigen uptake, processing, or presentation by dendritic cells. The same study also indicated that the ability of dendritic cells to induce T helper 17 (Th17) cells was markedly inhibited by Ctsk inactivation, which may be caused by a reduction in the expression of Th17 cell-related cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-23, by dendritic cells. Furthermore, Ctsk -/- mice were resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, in which Th17 cells are involved [26]. These results suggest that Ctsk plays an important role in the immune system and may serve as a valid therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases.

Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether CTSK plays a pathogenic role in the human immune system or in autoimmune/inflammatory diseases.

In other cells and tissues

New evidence suggests that CTSK is involved in extracellular matrix remodeling in organs such as the lung, thyroid, and skin, and plays a critical role in the development and progression of cardiovascular disease [38]. Extensive destruction of elastin and collagen caused by overexpression of cathepsins K and S has been related to the damage and inflammation of arterial wall, resulting in atherogenesis [15, 3841].

Variants in the CTSK gene

Thirty three different mutations have been reported in 59 pycnodysostosis families [1, 3, 8, 9, 14, 17, 20, 4254] (Table 1, Figure 1A). The Arg241 in exon 6 and Ala277 located in CpG dinucleotides in exon 7 are two mutational hot spots for pycnodysostosis (Figure 1B). Various mutations have been reported in pycnodysostosis patients, including 23 missense mutations (69.70%), 4 frame-shift mutations (12.12%), 3 nonsense mutations (9.09%), 2 splicing mutations (6.06%), and 1 termination codon mutation (3.03%) (Figure 1C). A total of 69.70% of the mutations occur in the mature domain of CTSK, 24.24% in the proregion, and 6.06% in the preregion (Figure 1D).
Table 1

Mutations in the CTSK gene causing pycnodysostosis

Location in DNA sequence

Genomic DNA sequence variants

Coding DNA sequence variants

Effect on amino acid

Location in protein sequence

First description

Missense

Exon 2

g.1551T > C

c.20T > C

p.Leu7Pro

Pre

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 2

g.1557T > C

c.26T > C

p.Leu9Pro

Pre

Nishi, et al., 1999

Exon 3

g.2128C > T

c.136C > T

p.Arg46Trp

Pro

Schilling, et al., 2007

Exon 3

g.2227G > A

c.235G > A

p.Gly79Arg

Pro

Fratzl-Zelman, et al., 2004

Exon 3

g.2228G > A

c.236G > A

p.Gly79Glu

Pro

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 5

g.4120C > T

c.422C > T

p.Ala141Val

Mature

Chavassieux, et al., 2008

Exon 5

g.4134G > C

c.436G > C

p.Gly146Arg

Mature

Gelb, et al., 1996

Exon 5

g.4192A > G

c.494A > G

p.Gln165Arg

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 5

g.4258A > C

c.560A > C

p.Gln187Pro

Mature

Li, et al., 2009

Exon 5

g.4278G > A

c.580G > A

p.Gly194Ser

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 6

g.8644A > G

c.635A > G

p.Tyr212Cys

Mature

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 6

g.8737 G > A

c.728G > A

p.Gly243Glu

Mature

Khan et al., 2010

Exon 6

g.8755T > C

c.746T > C

p.Ile249Thr

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 6

g.8758A > G

c.749A > G

p.Asp250Gly

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 7

g.9109C > T

c.830C > T

p.Ala277Val

Mature

Gelb, et al., 1998

Exon 7

g.9109C > A

c.830C > A

p.Ala277Glu

Mature

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 7

g.9171T > C

c.892T > C

p.Trp298Arg

Mature

Nishi, et al., 1999

Exon 8

g.9186G > A

c.908G > A

p.Gly303Glu

Mature

Toral-Lopez et al., 2010

Exon 8

g.11474T > C

c.926T > C

p.Leu309Pro

Mature

Haagerup, et al., 2000

Exon 8

g.11479G > C

c.931G > C

p.Ala311Pro

Mature

Nishi, et al., 1999

Exon 8

g.11482C > G

c.934C > G

p.Arg312Gly

Mature

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 8

g.11501G > A

c.953G > A

p.Cys318Tyr

Mature

Bertola et al., 2010

Exon 8

g.11503G > T

c.955G > T

p.Gly319Cys

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Nonsense

Exon 3

g.2146A > T

c.154A > T

p.Lys52X

Pro

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 5

g.4266C > T

c.568C > T

p.Gln190X

Mature

Hou, et al., 1999

Exon 6

g.8730C > T

c.721C > T

p.Arg241X

Mature

Gelb, et al., 1996

Frameshifts (duplication)

Exon 2

g.1591-1592dupGA

c.60_61dupGA

p.Ile21ArgfsX29

Pro

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Exon 4

g.2359dupA

c.282dupA

p.Val95SerfsX9

Pro

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Frameshifts (deletion)

Exon 3

g.2230delG

c.238delG

p.Asp80ThrfsX2

Pro

Fratzl-Zelman, et al., 2004

Exon 5

g.4124delT

c.426delT

p.Phe142LeufsX19

Mature

Fujita, et al., 2000

Splicing

Intron2

g.2112G > A

c.121-1G > A

p.del41Val-81Met

Pro

Haagerup, et al., 2000

Exon 7

g.9169G > A

c.890G > A; 785_890del

p.Gly262AlafsX70

Mature

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

Stop codon

Exon 8

g.11538A > G

c.990A > G

p.X330TrpextX19

Mature

Gelb, et al., 1996

Figure 1

Reported mutations of CTSK. (A) Distribution of the CTSK gene and polypeptide mutations. The genomic structure of the CTSK gene with 8 exons (purple boxes numbered 1-8) is shown in the top half. The bottom half illustrates the schematic representation of the polypeptide comprising a 15-amino acid preregion (yellow box), a 99-residue proregion (light blue boxes), and a 215-amino acid mature domain (orange boxes). A total of 23 missense mutations (black type) are represented at the top of the gene diagram, while frame-shift mutations (red type), nonsense mutations (light green type), splicing mutations (blue type), and termination codon mutations (yellow type) are at the bottom. (B) Frequency of different mutations. The height of each bar represents the number of afflicted families. #: Both mutations in the Glu70 residue. ##: Both mutations in the Ala277 residue. (C) The type of reported CTSK mutations. The mutations reported in pycnodysostosis patients consist of 23 missense mutations, 4 frame-shift mutations, 3 nonsense mutations, 2 splicing mutations, and 1 termination codon mutation. (D) Distribution of reported CTSK mutations. A total of 69.70% of the mutations occurred in the mature domain, 24.24% in the proregion, and 6.06% in the preregion.

The reported families and characteristics of different mutations are summarized in Table 2. In addition to paternal uniparental disomy in 1 family, compound heterozygous mutations were found in 14 afflicted families (23.73%), while homozygous mutations were found in 44 afflicted families (74.58%). Of the 59 unrelated families, 37.29% were from Europe while 30.51% came from Asia.
Table 2

Genotypes of pycnodysostosis patients from different nationalities

Allele 1

Allele 2

Patients reported

Unrelated families

Nationality of patients

Reference

c.436G > C

c.436G > C

1

1

Algerian

Osimani, et al., 2009

c.436G > C

c.721C > T

1

1

American Hispanic

Gelb, et al., 1996

c.235G > A

c.238delG

1

1

Austria

Fratzl-Zelman, et al., 2004

c.934C > G

c.934C > G

1

1

Austria

Fratzl-Zelman, et al., 2004

c.830C > T

c.830C > T

1

1

Belgian

Gelb, et al., 1998

c.953G > A

c.953G > A

2

2

Brazil

Bertola et al., 2010

c.953G > A

c.721C > T

1

1

Brazil

Bertola et al., 2010

c.721C > T

c.436G > C

1

1

Brazil

Bertola et al., 2010

c.721C > T

c.721C > T

2

2

Brazil

Bertola et al., 2010

c.494A > G

c.721C > T

1

1

Caucasian

Laffranchi et al., 2010

c.154A > T

c.236G > A

2

1

Caucasian

Ho, et al., 1999

c.560A > C

c.560A > C

1

1

Chinese

Li, et al., 2009

c.121-1G > A

c.926T > C

1

1

Denmark

Haagerup, et al., 2000

c.236G > A

c.926T > C

1

1

Denmark

Haagerup, et al., 2000

c.926T > C

c.926T > C

6

3

Denmark

Haagerup, et al., 2000

c.890G > A; 785_890del

c.890G > A; 785_890del

1

1

Egypt

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.136C > T

c.136C > T

3

1

Germany

Schilling, et al., 2007

c.934C > G

c.934C > G

2

1

Honduran

Hou, et al., 1999

c.830C > A

c.830C > A

1

1

Indian

Hou, et al., 1999

c.990A > G

c.990A > G

16

1

Israeli Arab

Gelb, et al., 1996

c.20T > C

c.580G > A

1

1

Italy

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.494A > G

c.721C > T

1

1

Italy

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.26T > C

c.26T > C

2

2

Japanese

Nishi, et al., 1999; Fujita, et al., 2000

c.26T > C

c.892T > C

1

1

Japanese

Nishi, et al., 1999

c.426delT

c.426delT

2

2

Japanese

Fujita, et al., 2000

c.830C > T

c.830C > T

3

3

Japanese

Nishi, et al., 1999; Fujita, et al., 2000

c.721C > T

c.721C > T

10

1

Mexican

Johnson, et al., 1996

c.908G > A

c.908G > A

3

1

Mexican

Toral-Lopez et al., 2010

c.60_61dupGA

c.60_61dupGA

3

1

Moroccan

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.436G > C

c.436G > C

1

1

Moroccan

Rothenbuhler et al., 2010

c.436G > C

c.436G > C

2

1

Moroccan Arab

Gelb, et al., 1996

c.282dupA

c.282dupA

1

1

Pakistan

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.728G > A

c.728G > A

5

1

Pakistani

Khan et al., 2010

c.749A > G

c.749A > G

1

1

Pakistan

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.830C > T

c.830C > T

5

3

Pakistan

Donnarumma, et al., 2007; Naeem, et al., 2009

c.955G > T

c.955G > T

1

1

Pakistan

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.721C > T

c.721C > T

2

2

Portuguese

Hou, et al., 1999; Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.830C > A

c.830C > A

1

1

Portuguese

Hou, et al., 1999

c.635A > G

c.721C > T

1

1

Spanish

Hou, et al., 1999

c.721C > T

c.746T > C

1

1

Spanish

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.721C > T

c.721C > T

1

1

Spanish

Rothenbuhler et al., 2010

c.931G > C

c.931G > C

2

1

Swiss

Nishi, et al., 1999

c.436G > C

c.436G > C

1

1

Tunisia

Donnarumma, et al., 2007

c.154A > T

c.236G > A

1

1

*

Hou, et al., 1999

c.568C > T

c.568C > T

1

1

*

Hou, et al., 1999

c.830C > T

c.830C > T

1

1

*

Hou, et al., 1999

c.422C > T

c.422C > T

1

1

Unknown

Chavassieux, et al., 2008

c.721C > T

c.721C > T

3

1

Unknown

Everts, et al., 2003

*: Two of the three families are from northern Europe, while the other is from Czech (no detailed record can be found in corresponding papers).

Characteristics of mutant CTSK proteins

In order to determine CTSK expression, monocyte-derived macrophages were isolated from the peripheral blood of 2 siblings suffering from pycnodysostosis and their unaffected parents. Western blot revealed no detectable expression of either the proform or mature form of CTSK in either affected sibling with p.Gly79Glu and p.Lys52X. The levels of both proform and mature forms of CTSK in the father, a carrier of p.Gly79Glu, were nearly half that in normal controls, while the levels in the mother, a carrier of p.Lys52X, were more severely decreased [50]. In another study, monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of a patient with p.Ala141Val and induced to differentiate into osteoclasts in vitro. As a result of the mutation, the ability of the patient-derived cells to resorb bone was significantly decreased [46].

Functional properties of CTSK mutants (p.Leu7Pro, p.Leu9Pro, p.Gly79Glu, p.Gly146Arg, p.Gln165Arg, p.Gly194Ser, p.Tyr212Cys, p.Ile249Thr, p.Asp250Gly, p.Ala277Glu, p.Ala277Val, p.Arg312Gly, p.Gly319Cys, and p.X330Trp) were examined by transient expression in COS-7 cells, 293 cells, and Pichia pastoris GS115 cells, respectively [14, 17, 20, 54]. Western blot analysis revealed that the mutants affecting residues of the mature domain yielded a mature form of a nonfunctional protein, while the mutants p.Leu7Pro, p.Leu9Pro, and p.X330Trp yielded a trace amount of this protein. In order to further understand the protein consequences of these missense mutations, amino acid changes of the mutant proteins, including p.Leu7Pro, p.Leu9Pro, p.Gln165Arg, p.Gly194Ser, p.Ile249Thr, p.Asp250Gly, and p.Gly319Cys, were modeled into the three-dimensional structure of the full-length CTSK. These mutations are predicted to affect the conformation of the protein [14].

All of these methods, including isolation of monocytes from the pycnodysostosis patients and transfection in COS-7 cells, 293 cells, and P. pastoris GS115 cells, demonstrated that CTSK mutants are functionally different from the wild type.

Ctsk-/- mouse models

The murine Ctsk gene maps to chromosome 3, and its predicted amino acid sequence is highly homologous to the human protein (85% identity; 93% similarity) [11]. Ctsk-/- mouse models play quite an important role in studying the nature and function of Ctsk in osteoclasts and other cells, in detecting the mechanisms of phenotypes of pycnodysostosis, and even in optimizing therapeutic strategies (including gene therapy) for the treatment of this genetic disorder [34, 55]. A homozygous null mutation in the mouse Ctsk gene was first established in 1998. Ctsk-/- mouse strains have been generated in different genetic backgrounds since then [34, 37, 5658]. All Ctsk-/- mouse strains could mimic the phenotype of human pycnodysostosis to different extents.

Generally, Ctsk deficient mice may survive and are fertile. The phenotype of Ctsk -/- mice resembles clinical characteristics of the human pycnodysostosis in several aspects, such as the presence of osteopetrosis, reduced bone marrow cellularity, and splenomegaly after 2 months of age [37, 58]. Using radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histological analyses, Ctsk-/- mice were shown to display an osteopetrotic phenotype with excessive trabeculation of the bone marrow space [56]. Deficiency of Ctsk affects the late stage of the osteoclastic resorption cycle. As a result, Ctsk-/- mice are unique among the currently available osteopetrotic mouse models [56].

Ctsk-/- mice generally have minor craniofacial anomalies, such as increased density of the maxilla and paranasal sinus bones as well as alterations in mandibular shape [37]. Other skeletal changes seen in pycnodysostosis patient, such as growth retardation, phalangeal deformities, and delayed suture closure in the skull, have seldom been reported in Ctsk-/- mice. Recent studies found that the pycnodysostosis phenotype in Ctsk-/- mice is background-dependent. Compared with other strains of Ctsk -/- mice, the phenotypical characteristics of 129/Sv Ctsk -/- mice were similar to those of human pycnodysostosis, including short stature, osteopetrosis in the long bones, spondylolysis, acroosteolysis, bone fragility, separated cranial sutures with open fontanels, loss of the mandibular angle, lack of normal occlusion, and enhanced open bite [34].

A transgenic mouse model overexpressing the Ctsk gene showed that excess Ctsk production resulted in a high turnover of the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Enhanced bone resorption in these mice led to increased osteoblast numbers and activities, possibly mediated by core-binding protein α1, a transcription factor essential for osteoblast differentiation [56].

Clinical relevance

A series of typical features in clinical and radiological examinations have been observed in pycnodysostosis. We summarized the manifestations in 97 reported cases (Table 3) [110, 17, 35, 4247, 50, 52, 53, 5991]. The most common phenotype of pycnodysostosis is short stature, which was reported in 95.9% of the 97 reported cases. The next most common phenotype is an increase in bone density, which was reported in 88.7% of the 97 patients. Open fontanels and sutures with frontal and parietal bossing, frequent fractures, hypoplasia of the maxilla and mandible with an obtuse mandibular angle, and stubby hands and feet with acroosteolysis of the distal phalanges were identified in more than 50% of the pycnodysostosis patients. Approximately one-third of the pycnodysostosis patients showed prominent eyes with bluish sclera. Additionally, these patients also show some dental defects, such as delayed eruption of permanent teeth with persistence of deciduous teeth, dental crowding, and malocclusion, which may be ignored by clinicians.
Table 3

Typical clinical features of pycnodysostosis*

Typical features

Positive

Negative

Not mentioned

Short stature (<150 cm)

93(95.9%)

0

4(4.1%)

Increase of bone density

86(88.7%)

0

11(11.3%)

Open fontanels and sutures

68-73(70.1%-75.3%)

0

24-29(24.7%-29.9%)

Frontal and parietal bossing

67-72(69.1%-74.2%)

0

25-30(25.8%-30.9%)

Fractures

65(67.0%)

3(3.1%)

29(29.9%)

Obtuse mandibular angle

63(64.9%)

0

34(35.1%)

Hypoplasia of the jaws

53-61(54.6%-62.9%)

0

36-44(37.1%-45.4%)

Stubby hands and feet with osteolysis of the distal phalanges

43-50(44.3%-51.5%)

0

47-54(48.5%-55.7%)

Prominent eyes with bluish sclerae

34(35.1%)

0

63(64.9%)

Grooved palate

20-28(20.6%-28.9%)

0

69-77(71.1%-79.4%)

Dysplastic nails

26(26.8%)

0

71(73.2%)

Clavicular dysplasia

24(24.7%)

0

73(75.3%)

Nonpneumatised paranasal sinuses

17(17.5%)

0

80(82.5%)

Beaked nose

16(16.5%)

0

81(83.5%)

*n = 97 (44 females, 42 males, and 11 unknown)

In addition to the typical manifestations mentioned above, some unusual findings, including hearing loss [5], central giant-cell granuloma of the maxilla [82], congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle [7], spondylolysis [79], and bone marrow hypoplasia with compensatory splenomegaly [76], were reported in pycnodysostosis patients.

Pycnodysostosis patients usually have normal life expectancies and mentations. Results of laboratory investigations, including leukocyte and thrombocyte number; mean corpuscular volume (MCV); and the levels of hemoglobin (Hb), plasma phosphate, calcium, and alkaline phosphatase, are usually within normal limits [1, 35].

Physiopathological mechanism of pycnodysostosis

Abnormal bone metabolism is the typical physiopathological characterics of pycnodysostosis. The most common phenotype of pycnodysostosis is short stature. Based on the results of animal experiments, the short stature in pycnodysostosis may be related to the reduced size of the long bones [37].

In addition, pycnodysostosis patients usually suffer from pathologic fractures as a result of brittle, chalk-like bones. Histomorphometric and biomechanical assays in Ctsk-/- mice have suggested that CTSK may play a critical role in matrix formation as well as breakdown. Large amounts of brittle, poorly organized matrix were formed in the absence of Ctsk gene, which corresponds to the bone fragility observed in patients with CTSK deficiency [57].

The coexistence of increased bone density in long bones (osteosclerosis) and osteolysis in the distal phalanges and calvariae is a typical characteristic of pycnodysostosis with CTSK mutation. One explanation may be the site-specific variations in bone homeostasis. It was reported that CTSK is clearly important to bone resorption in rapidly remodeling bones (e.g., the long bones), while it is not the most essential factor in regulating the bone resorption in bones with low turnover rates, such as the calvaria and epiphysis [34, 37, 48]. On the other hand, animal experiments have shown that metalloproteinases participate in osteoclastic resorption of calvarial bones, but not of long bones [34]. The increased number of Ctsk-/- osteoclasts may result in excessive bone resorption in the distal end of long bones (osteolysis), and the impaired ability of osteoclasts may account for the osteopetrosis in the main body of long bones [34, 37, 48, 56].

Immunophenotype analysis of the cell types in the bone marrow of Ctsk-/- mice revealed reductions in absolute cell numbers, but not in the percentages of all the different subtypes, indicating that marrow hypoplasia results from the reduction in bone marrow cavity space, which is caused by osteopetrosis. As a result, extramedullary hematopoiesis occurs in the spleen (enlarged with a significantly elevated cellularity) to compensate for the reduced bone marrow cellularity [37].

Diagnosis and differential diagnoses

Although CTSK gene mutation analysis is the confirmatory test for pycnodysostosis, the diagnosis can be established primarily based on the aforementioned clinical features and radiograph findings [5]. On the other hand, pycnodysostosis should be distinguished from other genetic bone diseases, particularly cleidocranial dysostosis (CCD) and osteopetrosis [5, 47, 68]. Clavicular hypoplasia and typical craniofacial characteristics, especially the open fontanels and cranial sutures in pycnodysostosis, may lead to misdiagnosis of cleidocranial dysplasia. However, increased bone density with recurrent fractures is highly suggestive of pycnodysostosis [9295]. Short stature and generalized osteosclerosis with multiple fractures in pycnodysostosis patients has been misdiagnosed as osteopetrosis [71, 9698]. However, acroosteolysis of the distal phalanges and unclosed cranial sutures and fontanels are indicative of pycnodysostosis.

Treatment

To date, no specific treatment has been validated in pycnodysostosis with the exception of symptomatic management [5, 46]. Because bone fractures are a primary threat to these patients, it is important to prevent fracture-causing factors. These patients are likely to visit dentists because oral deformities severely affect their life. Here, we would like to emphasize the role of dentists in the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. Maintenance of oral hygiene and regular dental care may help prevent some oral complications. However, the greater bone density increases the probability of developing postextraction osteomyelitis. Thus, risk factors should be carefully addressed while planning tooth extraction and other treatments. In summary, it is quite important to establish a correct diagnosis as early as possible to prevent fractures and ensure a better quality of life [5, 6, 54].

Future prospects

Genotype-phenotype correlation draws great attention in the field of genetic disorder research. Clinical features with CTSK genetic analysis were reported in 42 pycnodysostosis patients from 24 families [1, 3, 8, 9, 17, 4247, 50, 52, 53]. However, the detailed clinical information was poorly described in most of the reports with molecular data. Lack of good clinical information makes it difficult to evaluate of the genotype-phenotype correlation of pycnodysostosis. More detailed information about the clinical and genetic characteristics in pycnodysostosis patients are necessary for the further research to elucidate the CTSK genotype-phenotype correlation.

Research on specific approaches to correct the abnormal bone metabolism in pycnodysostosis is another hot topic. Due to providing normal osteoclasts and osteoclast-targeted enzymes, bone marrow transplantation is drawing the increasing attention. Gene replacement strategies are other alternative choices. However, considerable research is required in this area [54].

Recently, CTSK was shown to play an important role in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases by animal and in vitro experiments [26]. If the role of CTSK in the human immune system is confirmed [99], it will be helpful in further understanding of the mechanism of pycnodysostosis and in designing specific treatment strategies.

List of abbreviations

COS-7 cells: 

COS-7 SV40-transformed kidney cells

CTSK: 

Ctsk: cathepsin K

Hb: 

hemoglobin

IL-6: 

interleukin 6

IL-23: 

interleukin 23

MCV: 

mean corpuscular volume

RANKL: 

receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand

Th17: 

T helper 17 cells

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

This work was supported in part by grants of Key Projects of Science and Technology of Xi'an City of China [SF09027(4)], Key Projects of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province of China (2009K17-06), and National Scientific Foundation of China (81070819). As a disclaimer, T.C. represented his own perspective in the paper, not the NIDCR/NIH.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, the Fourth Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Oral Biology, School of Stomatology, the Fourth Military Medical University
(3)
Oral Infection and Immunity Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health
(4)
Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California School of Dentistry
(5)
Center of Cardiovascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University

References

  1. Naeem M, Sheikh S, Ahmad W: A mutation in CTSK gene in an autosomal recessive pycnodysostosis family of Pakistani origin. BMC Med Genet. 2009, 10: 76-80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleming KW, Barest G, Sakai O: Dental and facial bone abnormalities in pyknodysostosis: CT findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007, 28: 132-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Schilling AF, Mulhausen C, Lehmann W, et al: High bone mineral density in pycnodysostotic patients with a novel mutation in the propeptide of cathepsin K. Osteoporos Int. 2007, 18: 659-669. 10.1007/s00198-006-0311-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Soliman AT, Ramadan MA, Sherif A, et al: Pycnodysostosis: clinical, radiologic, and endocrine evaluation and linear growth after growth hormone therapy. Metabolism. 2001, 50: 905-911. 10.1053/meta.2001.24924.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mujawar Q, Naganoor R, Patil H, et al: Pycnodysostosis with unusual findings: a case report. Cases J. 2009, 2: 6544-6547. 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6544.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fonteles CS, Chaves CM, Da Silveira A, et al: Cephalometric characteristics and dentofacial abnormalities of pycnodysostosis: report of four cases from Brazil. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007, 104: e83-90. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Karakurt L, Yilmaz E, Belhan O, et al: Pycnodysostosis associated with bilateral congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003, 123: 125-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Osimani S, Husson I, Passemard S, et al: Craniosynostosis: A rare complication of pycnodysostosis. Eur J Med Genet. 2010, 53: 89-92. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li HY, Ma HW, Wang HQ, et al: Molecular analysis of a novel cathepsin K gene mutation in a Chinese child with pycnodysostosis. J Int Med Res. 2009, 37: 264-269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Teissier N, Jacquemont ML, Blancal JP, et al: Severe snoring in a child with pycnodysostosis treated with a bilateral rib graft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009, 46: 93-96. 10.1597/06-199.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelb BD, Moissoglu K, Zhang J, et al: Cathepsin K: isolation and characterization of the murine cDNA and genomic sequence, the homologue of the human pycnodysostosis gene. Biochem Mol Med. 1996, 59: 200-206. 10.1006/bmme.1996.0088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Polymeropoulos MH, Ortiz De Luna RI, Ide SE, et al: The gene for pycnodysostosis maps to human chromosome 1cen-q21. Nat Genet. 1995, 10: 238-239. 10.1038/ng0695-238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gelb BD, Edelson JG, Desnick RJ: Linkage of pycnodysostosis to chromosome 1q21 by homozygosity mapping. Nat Genet. 1995, 10: 235-237. 10.1038/ng0695-235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Donnarumma M, Regis S, Tappino B, et al: Molecular analysis and characterization of nine novel CTSK mutations in twelve patients affected by pycnodysostosis. Hum Mutat. 2007, 28: 524-533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berdowska I: Cysteine proteases as disease markers. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2004, 342: 41-69. 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.12.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. LaLonde JM, Zhao B, Janson CA, et al: The crystal structure of human procathepsin K. Biochemistry. 1999, 38: 862-869. 10.1021/bi9822271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujita Y, Nakata K, Yasui N, et al: Novel mutations of the cathepsin K gene in patients with pycnodysostosis and their characterization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85: 425-431. 10.1210/jc.85.1.425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schatz G, Dobberstein B: Common principles of protein translocation across membranes. Science. 1996, 271: 1519-1526. 10.1126/science.271.5255.1519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. von Heijne G: The signal peptide. J Membr Biol. 1990, 115: 195-201. 10.1007/BF01868635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou WS, Bromme D, Zhao Y, et al: Characterization of novel cathepsin K mutations in the pro and mature polypeptide regions causing pycnodysostosis. J Clin Invest. 1999, 103: 731-738. 10.1172/JCI653.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McQueney MS, Amegadzie BY, D'Alessio K, et al: Autocatalytic activation of human cathepsin K. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 13955-13960. 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Z, Kienetz M, Cherney MM, et al: The Crystal and Molecular Structures of a Cathepsin K:Chondroitin Sulfate Complex. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2008, 383: 78-91. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhao Q, Jia Y, Xiao Y: Cathepsin K: A therapeutic target for bone diseases. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2009, 380: 721-723. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Sivaraman J, Lalumiere M, Menard R, et al: Crystal structure of wild-type human procathepsin K. Protein Sci. 1999, 8: 283-290.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Turk B, Turk V, Turk D: Structural and functional aspects of papain-like cysteine proteinases and their protein inhibitors. Biol Chem. 1997, 378: 141-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Asagiri M, Hirai T, Kunigami T, et al: Cathepsin K-dependent toll-like receptor 9 signaling revealed in experimental arthritis. Science. 2008, 319: 624-627. 10.1126/science.1150110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Honey K, Rudensky AY: Lysosomal cysteine proteases regulate antigen presentation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3: 472-482. 10.1038/nri1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kornak U, Kasper D, Bosl MR, et al: Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 2001, 104: 205-215. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00206-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Segovia-Silvestre T, Neutzsky-Wulff AV, Sorensen MG, et al: Advances in osteoclast biology resulting from the study of osteopetrotic mutations. Hum Genet. 2009, 124: 561-577. 10.1007/s00439-008-0583-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dodds RA, James IE, Rieman D, et al: Human osteoclast cathepsin K is processed intracellularly prior to attachment and bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 2001, 16: 478-486. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.478.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieman DJ, McClung HA, Dodds RA, et al: Biosynthesis and processing of cathepsin K in cultured human osteoclasts. Bone. 2001, 28: 282-289. 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00445-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Runger TM, Quintanilla-Dieck MJ, Bhawan J: Role of cathepsin K in the turnover of the dermal extracellular matrix during scar formation. J Invest Dermatol. 2007, 127: 293-297. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700535.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bromme D, Kaleta J: Thiol-dependent cathepsins: pathophysiological implications and recent advances in inhibitor design. Curr Pharm Des. 2002, 8: 1639-1658. 10.2174/1381612023394179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen W, Yang S, Abe Y, et al: Novel pycnodysostosis mouse model uncovers cathepsin K function as a potential regulator of osteoclast apoptosis and senescence. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16: 410-423.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Alibhai ZA, Matee MI, Chindia ML, et al: Presentation and management of chronic osteomyelitis in an African patient with pycnodysostosis. Oral Dis. 1999, 5: 87-89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Karkabi S, Reis ND, Linn S, et al: Pyknodysostosis: imaging and laboratory observations. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993, 53: 170-173. 10.1007/BF01321833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gowen M, Lazner F, Dodds R, et al: Cathepsin K knockout mice develop osteopetrosis due to a deficit in matrix degradation but not demineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 1999, 14: 1654-1663. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1654.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Podgorski I: Future of anticathepsin K drugs: dual therapy for skeletal disease and atherosclerosis?. Future Med Chem. 2009, 1: 21-34. 10.4155/fmc.09.4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lecaille F, Bromme D, Lalmanach G: Biochemical properties and regulation of cathepsin K activity. Biochimie. 2008, 90: 208-226. 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.08.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu J, Sukhova GK, Sun JS, et al: Lysosomal cysteine proteases in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24: 1359-1366. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000134530.27208.41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lutgens SP, Cleutjens KB, Daemen MJ, et al: Cathepsin cysteine proteases in cardiovascular disease. FASEB J. 2007, 21: 3029-3041. 10.1096/fj.06-7924com.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothenbuhler A, Piquard C, Gueorguieva I, et al: Near normalization of adult height and body proportions by growth hormone in pycnodysostosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 2827-2831. 10.1210/jc.2009-2531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Laffranchi L, Dalessandri D, Tonni I, et al: Use of CBCT in the orthodontic diagnosis of a patient with pycnodysostosis. Minerva Stomatol. 2010, 59: 653-661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Khan B, Ahmed Z, Ahmad W: A novel missense mutation in cathepsin K (CTSK) gene in a consanguineous Pakistani family with pycnodysostosis. J Investig Med. 2010, 58: 720-724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bertola D, Amaral C, Kim C, et al: Craniosynostosis in pycnodysostosis: broadening the spectrum of the cranial flat bone abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A. 2010, 152A: 2599-2603. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Chavassieux P, Asser Karsdal M, Segovia-Silvestre T, et al: Mechanisms of the anabolic effects of teriparatide on bone: insight from the treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008, 23: 1076-1083. 10.1359/jbmr.080231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Fratzl-Zelman N, Valenta A, Roschger P, et al: Decreased bone turnover and deterioration of bone structure in two cases of pycnodysostosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 1538-1547. 10.1210/jc.2003-031055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Everts V, Hou WS, Rialland X, et al: Cathepsin K deficiency in pycnodysostosis results in accumulation of non-digested phagocytosed collagen in fibroblasts. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003, 73: 380-386. 10.1007/s00223-002-2092-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Haagerup A, Hertz JM, Christensen MF, et al: Cathepsin K gene mutations and 1q21 haplotypes in at patients with pycnodysostosis in an outbred population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000, 8: 431-436. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ho N, Punturieri A, Wilkin D, et al: Mutations of CTSK result in pycnodysostosis via a reduction in cathepsin K protein. J Bone Miner Res. 1999, 14: 1649-1653. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nishi Y, Atley L, Eyre DE, et al: Determination of bone markers in pycnodysostosis: effects of cathepsin K deficiency on bone matrix degradation. J Bone Miner Res. 1999, 14: 1902-1908. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.11.1902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Gelb BD, Willner JP, Dunn TM, et al: Paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 1 revealed by molecular analysis of a patient with pycnodysostosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 848-854. 10.1086/301795.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson MR, Polymeropoulos MH, Vos HL, et al: A nonsense mutation in the cathepsin K gene observed in a family with pycnodysostosis. Genome Res. 1996, 6: 1050-1055. 10.1101/gr.6.11.1050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gelb BD, Shi GP, Chapman HA, et al: Pycnodysostosis, a lysosomal disease caused by cathepsin K deficiency. Science. 1996, 273: 1236-1238. 10.1126/science.273.5279.1236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lazner F, Gowen M, Kola I: An animal model for pycnodysostosis: the role of cathepsin K in bone remodelling. Mol Med Today. 1999, 5: 413-414. 10.1016/S1357-4310(99)01563-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kiviranta R, Morko J, Alatalo SL, et al: Impaired bone resorption in cathepsin K-deficient mice is partially compensated for by enhanced osteoclastogenesis and increased expression of other proteases via an increased RANKL/OPG ratio. Bone. 2005, 36: 159-172. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Li CY, Jepsen KJ, Majeska RJ, et al: Mice lacking cathepsin K maintain bone remodeling but develop bone fragility despite high bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2006, 21: 865-875. 10.1359/jbmr.060313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Saftig P, Hunziker E, Wehmeyer O, et al: Impaired osteoclastic bone resorption leads to osteopetrosis in cathepsin-K-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 13453-13458. 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13453.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yates CJ, Bartlett MJ, Ebeling PR: An atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture from pycnodysostosis - a lesson from nature. J Bone Miner Res.Google Scholar
  60. Toral-Lopez J, Gonzalez-Huerta LM, Sosa B, et al: Familial Pycnodysostosis: Identification of a Novel Mutation in the CTSK Gene (Cathepsin K). J Investig Med. 2011, 59: 277-280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Arenaz Bua J, Serra Serrat M, et al: Orthognathic surgery in pycnodysostosis: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011, 40: 110-113. 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Frota R, Linard RA, de Oliveira e Silva ED, et al: Mandibular osteomyelitis and fracture in a patient with pyknodysostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2010, 21: 787-789. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7f2b0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Senel S, Karacan C, Orun UA, et al: Mitral valve prolapse in two siblings with pyknodysostosis. Genet Couns. 2009, 20: 397-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nagura I, Fujioka H, Nabeshima Y, et al: Monteggia fracture managed by intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation with pyknodysostosis. J Orthop Sci. 2009, 14: 820-822. 10.1007/s00776-009-1385-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ornetti P, Prati C, Fery-Blanco C, et al: Pedicle stress fracture: an unusual complication of pycnodysostosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 27: 385-387. 10.1007/s10067-007-0740-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Olubaniyi BO, Sinha AK, Bako K, et al: Extradural haematoma: a rare, but fatal complication of pyknodysostosis. Br J Neurosurg. 2008, 22: 594-595. 10.1080/02688690801905582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Soares LF, Souza IPR, Cardoso AS, et al: Pyknodysostosis: Oral findings and differential diagnosis. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent. 2008, Suppl: 23-25.Google Scholar
  68. Alves Pereira D, Berini Aytes L, Gay Escoda C, Pycnodysostosis: A report of 3 clinical cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008, 13: E633-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ainola M, Valleala H, Nykanen P, et al: Erosive arthritis in a patient with pycnodysostosis: an experiment of nature. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58: 3394-3401. 10.1002/art.23996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nakase T, Yasui N, Hiroshima K, et al: Surgical outcomes after treatment of fractures in femur and tibia in pycnodysostosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007, 127: 161-165. 10.1007/s00402-006-0270-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Dimitrakopoulos I, Magopoulos C, Katopodi T: Mandibular Osteomyelitis in a Patient With Pyknodysostosis: A Case Report of a 50-Year Misdiagnosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007, 65: 580-585. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Wadia F, Shah N, Porter M: Bilateral charnley low-friction arthroplasty with cement in a patient with pyknodysostosis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006, 88: 1846-1848. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Moniz N, Queiroz EA, Freitas RR, et al: Mandibular reconstruction with autogenous graft in patient presenting pyknodysostosis: case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006, 64: 1292-1295. 10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Muto T, Yamazaki A, Takeda S, et al: Pharyngeal narrowing as a common feature in pycnodysostosis--a cephalometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 34: 680-685. 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kato H, Matsuoka K, Kato N, et al: Mandibular osteomyelitis and fracture successfully treated with vascularised iliac bone graft in a patient with pycnodysostosis. Br J Plast Surg. 2005, 58: 263-266. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.10.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh AR, Kaur A, Anand NK, et al: Pyknodysostosis: visceral manifestations and simian crease. Indian J Pediatr. 2004, 71: 453-455. 10.1007/BF02725641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Norholt SE, Bjerregaard J, Mosekilde L: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in a patient with pycnodysostosis: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004, 62: 1037-1040. 10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kundu ZS, Marya KM, Devgan A, et al: Subtrochanteric fracture managed by intramedullary nail in a patient with pycnodysostosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2004, 71: 154-156. 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00143-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Zenke MS, Hatori M, Tago S, et al: Pycnodysostosis associated with spondylolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002, 122: 248-250. 10.1007/s00402-001-0360-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ram PB, Ram SK, Neitzschman H: Radiology case of the month. Sclerotic bone disease in an 8-year-old dwarf. Pycnodysostosis. J La State Med Soc. 2002, 154: 287-288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Kirita T, Sugiura T, Horiuchi K, et al: Mandibular reconstruction using a vascularised fibula osteocutaneous flap in a patient with pyknodysostosis. Br J Plast Surg. 2001, 54: 712-714. 10.1054/bjps.2001.3708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Thomas N, Seshadri MS, Thomas G, et al: Association of central giant-cell granuloma of the maxilla with pyknodysostosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000, 38: 159-160. 10.1054/bjom.1998.0020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Landa S, Esteban S, Montes E, et al: Maxillofacial alterations in a family with pycnodysostosis. Med Oral. 2000, 5: 169-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Bathi RJ, Masur VN: Pyknodysostosis--a report of two cases with a brief review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000, 29: 439-442. 10.1016/S0901-5027(00)80076-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Agarwal I, Kirubakaran C, Sridhar G: Pyknodysostosis: a report of two siblings with unusual manifestations. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1999, 19: 301-305. 10.1080/02724939992419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. O'Connell AC, Brennan MT, Francomano CA: Pycnodysostosis: orofacial manifestations in two pediatric patients. Pediatr Dent. 1998, 20: 204-207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Hunt NP, Cunningham SJ, Adnan N, et al: The dental, craniofacial, and biochemical features of pyknodysostosis: a report of three new cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998, 56: 497-504. 10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90722-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Mocan H, Soylu H, Mocan MZ, et al: Pyknodysostosis: hemangioma of the skull as a new finding. Genet Couns. 1997, 8: 213-216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Soliman AT, Rajab A, AlSalmi I, et al: Defective growth hormone secretion in children with pycnodysostosis and improved linear growth after growth hormone treatment. Arch Dis Child. 1996, 75: 242-244. 10.1136/adc.75.3.242.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmitz JP, Gassmann CJ, Bauer AM, et al: Mandibular reconstruction in a patient with pyknodysostosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996, 54: 513-517. 10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90131-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Darcan S, Akisu M, Taneli B, et al: A case of pycnodysostosis with growth hormone deficiency. Clin Genet. 1996, 50: 422-425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Farronato G, Maspero C, Farronato D, et al: Orthodontic treatment in a patient with cleidocranial dysostosis. Angle Orthod. 2009, 79: 178-185. 10.2319/111307-393.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Lossdorfer S, Abou Jamra B, Rath-Deschner B, et al: The role of periodontal ligament cells in delayed tooth eruption in patients with cleidocranial dysostosis. J Orofac Orthop. 2009, 70: 495-510. 10.1007/s00056-009-9934-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Manjunath K, Kavitha B, Saraswathi TR, et al: Cementum analysis in cleidocranial dysostosis. Indian J Dent Res. 2008, 19: 253-256. 10.4103/0970-9290.42960.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Vakili R, Jalali F: Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism associated with cleidocranial dysostosis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 18: 917-919. 10.1515/JPEM.2005.18.9.917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Benichou OD, Laredo JD, de Vernejoul MC: Type II autosomal dominant osteopetrosis (Albers-Schonberg disease): clinical and radiological manifestations in 42 patients. Bone. 2000, 26: 87-93. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00244-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Del Fattore A, Cappariello A, Teti A: Genetics, pathogenesis and complications of osteopetrosis. Bone. 2008, 42: 19-29. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Tolar J, Teitelbaum SL, Orchard PJ: Osteopetrosis. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 2839-2849. 10.1056/NEJMra040952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Krieg AM, Lipford GB, Immunology: The toll of cathepsin K deficiency. Science. 2008, 319: 576-577. 10.1126/science.1154207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xue et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement